Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Roland Stuurman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hsu vs Stuurman analysis and find out who is favored!
Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Roland Stuurman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hsu 1 - 0 Stuurman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hsu has won 49.88% of points on his second serve, while Stuurman has won 44.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hsu, in recent form, has won 53.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stuurman has won 53.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.37% and 33.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hsu has saved 62.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stuurman has saved 45.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hsu has won 55.17% of matches played (W/L 32/ 26), with Stuurman winning 60.78% (W/L 31/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hsu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 216/ 108), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Stuurman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 48/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 52/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Hsu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 18/ 21), where as Stuurman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.78% of matches (W/L 31/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hsu winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hsu winning 2 and Stuurman winning 0. The last match between Hsu and Stuurman was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 17-11-2021, First, Hard with Yu Hsiou Hsu getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hsu and Stuurman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hsu winning 0 times and Stuurman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hsu winning 0, and Stuurman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hsu has played against opponents with an average rank of 233.78 while Stuurman has played against players with an average rank of 49.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hsu has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stuurman has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hsu has converted 40.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stuurman has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
229
Rank
158
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
64% (248-142)
Career Total W/L
52% (101-92)
56% (18-14)
YTD W/L
65% (15-8)
$281,770
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yu Hsiou Hsu | Roland Stuurman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (29/47) | 69% (38/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (23/29) | 66% (25/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (10/18) | 29% (5/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (25/55) | 30% (14/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Roland Stuurman
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yu Hsiou Hsu | Roland Stuurman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (18/14) | 65% (15/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (40/35) | 57% (30/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (375/332) | 54% (285/243) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (16/12) | 65% (15/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 132 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:55 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 246.47 | 31.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1369/2179) | 67% (357/534) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (966/1369) | 60% (215/357) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (404/810) | 45% (79/177) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (91/225) | 44% (24/54) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (856/2144) | 41% (228/552) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) | 65% (15/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (18/32) | 62% (13/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 22% (9/2) |
Yu Hsiou Hsu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Seong Chan Hong
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Rio Noguchi
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
66 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
11
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Brandon Holt
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Yan Bai
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
15
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Yi Zhou
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Roland Stuurman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tauheed Browning
Player
Roland Stuurman
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roland Stuurman
Player
Romain Faucon
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Roland Stuurman
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hsu Vs Stuurman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
